Not all “stuff” is created equal….or is even useful at all.

I’m not talking about diamond studded toothbrushes for your toy poodle.  That’s fine with me.  If you want to waste money on your dog’s oral hygiene, so be it.

I’m talking about entire industries/sectors of the economy that don’t provide anything useful or are unduly bloated.  Their existence is a distortion; a fluke of a particular set of conditions at the marcro level (govt, laws, etc).

Here is an example often given:  Income inequality creates crime because the really poor want what the really rich have….so some portion of them steal it.  If there are more poor and more rich (the income distribution widens)….there is more theft.  To combat this situation the really rich simply move into gated communities, install security systems, etc. 

Some portion of the home/personal security market is a distortion due to income inequality.  In my opinion, although it adds to GDP, it should subtract from it.  It is a negative value service/product.

Though the US has a 12 trillion dollar GDP….I think much of it is a fantasy.  I don’t know what percentage might fall into this “useless” or “distortion” category…but it does make me wonder how “rich” our country really is.  What is rich?  Is it having enough money to buy stuff that will insulate you from the poor?

Anyway, these arguments have been made before, but the reason I’m bringing it up again is that there is another sector of the economy much larger than personal security that I think is of debatable usefulness…and whose size is certainly a distortion:  FINANCE.

Finance will of course always exist (as will Accounting, Financial Advisors, Insurance, Lawyers, etc); however, there are so many laws and obscurity in finance, that sometimes I wonder if much of the industry is a fiction….just pushing around numbers on balance sheets, or “trading” assets that aren’t backed by anything REAL. 

I’ll give two examples:

1)  Hedging:  In managing hedges, if someone makes a negative bet on company A, in theory it allows someone else to make a positive bet on company A and maintain the overall hedge.  In my example it is easy to see that there is no real value created, just two opposing bets in a zero sum game. 

But if you manage thousands or millions of those bets, and roll them up into a balance sheet and play some accounting tricks….it may look like you have real assets, which of course someone else could then potentially hedge against.  The fact remains it is a zero sum game, an accounting fiction adding no real value….just pushing paper. 

2)  Derivatives:  If hedging seems complicated, derivatives are even more mind blowing.  Let’s take the “assets” created in the previous example, and decide that we don’t want to invest/hedge on Company A anymore…..we want to invest in part of company A and part of company B.  Of course that entity doesn’t actually exist, but through derivatives you can create it on paper. 

Do you have a new asset?  If you combine a bunch of things based on a bunch of other things in a cascade of derivatives, you eventually get so far from reality that you don’t understand the assets backing the paper.  Are there any?  Is your derivative simply backed by another package of derivatives that folds back on itself or ends in a dead end?

It is easy to see that if enough people play the game outlined above, you’ve created something from nothing.  Its a distortion too complex to get your head around, so you assume its real because really smart people are using big formulas at the top of tall buildings to work it all out.

In the end, I think much of the “cloud” of finance exists as a distortion.  In a world where people eat, sleep, talk, and move on things that EXIST in the real world……if all those fancy financial instruments didn’t exist would we be any worse off?

I don’t think so.  At least not materially (since of course there isn’t much material about finance).

What about all those jobs?  Legions of very, very smart people are employing their time in industries (Accounting, Finance, etc) that shouldn’t be as large as they are….which means they are NOT doing something else, which could be more useful:  Medicine, Science, Construction, Engineering, Teaching, etc.

Imagine how much better off we’d be if the brainpower of finance were focused on advancing clean energy technology?

Some may say, “Finance is enabling clean energy technology…by allowing money to flow into it.”

I say, “Yes.  Finance can be useful, parts of it are useful.  However, the bloat and complexity of the current system is not.  It is just dangerous paper pushing….created by distortions, enabling further distortions…..creating assets that don’t really exist and diverting brainpower from other industries where it could be better employed.”

I remember when Enron went bust I said, “Through fancy accounting tricks, one day a company is going to make a profit selling to itself.”  Well….its already happened.  The entire industry of Finance is making a profit selling to itself….forever pushing pieces of paper back and forth amongst itself….thinking that somehow it is creating value.

Tags:
One Response to “Finance: Is it useful?”
  1. Kat says:

    Where are you living these days. I’m in Easley til January.

Leave a Reply