The GDP growth rates during times of high marginal tax rates on the rich have historically been better than when they were low.<\/a> Understand? \u00a0Growth is BETTER when tax rates are high on the rich.<\/p>\n\t2. \u00a0If tax cuts for the rich were stimulative, we’d be in boom times right now, but we are not. \u00a0The Bush tax cuts were largely tax cuts for the rich. \u00a0They did not stimulate the economy when enacted, and now the argument is that if they are taken away the economy would be even worse? \u00a0Not true.<\/p>\n\t
3. \u00a0There was one other time in our nation’s history where taxes on the rich were this low: \u00a0right before the Great Depression.<\/p>\n\t
The funner, better question is why? \u00a0Why are high taxes on the rich better for the economy?<\/p>\n\t
Myths about taxes and the rich:<\/strong><\/p>\n\tMore money for the rich creates jobs. <\/strong><\/p>\n\tReally? How? Businesses create jobs, not rich people (unless you count their housekeepers). \u00a0Giving more money to the rich simply makes them richer. \u00a0More money for the rich does not make their businesses richer either (the money leaves the company when they pay themselves).<\/p>\n\t
Payouts to the rich actually make businesses poorer, since that money is not available to fund new projects. \u00a0Low capital gains taxes can also produce this effect. \u00a0High taxes for the rich are stimulative because it encourages companies not to pay out that money, which the businesses can then use internally to make investments.<\/p>\n\t
But, still, the rich have money, which they then spend, which creates jobs, right? No. \u00a0I do agree that demand for additional goods\/services creates jobs. \u00a0But rich people do not create as much demand as others. \u00a0A rich person saves a good percentage of their money, which is a drain on the economy (since that money is not spent to create demand for additional goods\/services).<\/p>\n\t
To reiterate: \u00a0Extra money for the rich stimulates the economy less than <\/strong>extra money for the middle class because they save a good portion of their money.<\/p>\n\tBut the rich use that savings to invest their money which is good for the economy, right? <\/strong><\/p>\n\tWrong.<\/p>\n\t
The word “invest” is used too loosely. \u00a0I wish there were another word.<\/p>\n\t
In economics, Investment is good for the economy. \u00a0It is defined as business expense (minus SG&A) and purchase of capital goods. \u00a0Businesses generally make investments. \u00a0They include purchase of machinery, expansion into a new line of business, improvements on a\u00a0facility, even education of the workforce.<\/p>\n\t
In finance, Investment is when you buy something and hope to sell it for more later. \u00a0This is just speculation. \u00a0That is what the rich are doing<\/strong>. \u00a0This does not help the economy (unless you work in finance). \u00a0Purchasing stock, bonds, mutual funds, etc. IS NOT INVESTMENT. \u00a0The underlying companies DO NOT GET ANY OF THAT MONEY (only at the initial sale does the company get money. \u00a0The entire stock market is a second hand market.) \u00a0The vast majority of business initiatives are funded through excess profit, not equity (or debt). \u00a0Even when the rich do spend money on IPOs where companies get the money, this is not a significant source of funding for new business ventures.<\/p>\n\tIn short, the “investment” that the rich make with their excess savings does not help the economy. <\/strong>It encourages speculation or, more to the point, it IS speculation<\/strong>….which is incidentally exactly where we are right now with the financial crisis: \u00a0too much speculation.<\/p>\n\tPutting more money in people’s pockets through tax cuts is a good way to stimulate the economy.<\/strong><\/p>\n\tNo. \u00a0In most cases, taxes are neutral for the overall\u00a0economy.<\/p>\n\t
As covered earlier, tax cuts for the rich do not stimulate because they save more of their money. \u00a0Let’s say the rich spend 80% (which becomes someone else’s income) and save 20% (which goes largely into bank accounts or speculation and is not stimulative).<\/p>\n\t
As an aside here, you may say “Well, then the 20% the rich have in bank accounts is then lent to allow businesses to pursue new initiatives. \u00a0It IS still sound\u00a0economic\u00a0investment in the end.”<\/p>\n\t
Nope. \u00a0Banks don’t need deposits to lend; that money is good for nothing until spent. \u00a0Banks can always get the money they need to lend (meet their reserve requirement) through borrowing from the Federal Reserve, which has to lend to them by law (and creates money out of thin air so there is no natural limit). \u00a0Lending is limited only by the number of credit worthy people\/projects, not by deposits.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\tIf the government taxed away the rich’s extra money, the government would spend 100% of it, not 80% of it (since the government never saves). \u00a0So….the government taxing away the rich’s money is actually stimulative<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\tWhat about the rest of us (the non-rich)? \u00a0We spend almost all of our money. \u00a0If the government taxes away our money, it is a wash at an aggregate level….either they spend 100% of it or we spend 100% of it.<\/p>\n\t
So, tax cuts in general don’t stimulate the economy. \u00a0What taxes do is allow the government to pick winners\/losers. \u00a0The government simply takes the money from us and puts it elsewhere. \u00a0Sometimes we agree with where they put it (highways, education, etc.); sometimes we disagree (wars, etc.).<\/p>\n\t
To reiterate, tax cuts do not generally stimulate the economy. \u00a0They are a neutral<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\tAlthough a bit more controversial, there is some data\/history and a plausible mechanism to make the case that high taxes <\/strong>for the rich<\/strong> encourage growth, not low taxes. \u00a0With high taxes for the rich, the businesses are encouraged to keep the money and make investments to fund new initiatives and the rich \u00a0save more of their money (which does not help the economy). \u00a0With high taxes on corporate profit, business is also encouraged to spend the money on improvements\/investments (which would be pre-tax) instead of taking the money as profit (which is taxed). \u00a0Excess profit does not create jobs or stimulate growth. \u00a0Demand for goods and services <\/strong>in excess of what the company can provide with current resources creates jobs and stimulates the economy.<\/p>\n\tTo conclude, I do not understand the tax cut for the rich argument. \u00a0Data and history do not back it up and there is no logical plausible mechanism for it.<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A little high level data\/history here, and then we’ll jump into Myths related to taxes for the rich. \u00a0I will provide a logical plausible mechanism for why low taxes for the rich do not stimulate the economy. 1. \u00a0The GDP growth rates during times of high marginal tax rates on the rich have historically been […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0},"categories":[1],"tags":[28,59,78],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3IMYj-8U","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":479,"url":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=479","url_meta":{"origin":552,"position":0},"title":"Capitalism, Jobs, and Supply Side Economics: Companies are not in business to hire people. They are in business to make money.","author":"kellio","date":"September 19, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"The supply side argument goes that if companies (and the rich) have more money (through incentives, lower tax rates, etc.), they will use that extra money to invest and create jobs. This argument is silly. \u00a0Republicans have been making this argument since Reagan, and perhaps they really believe it...but it\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=479#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":320,"url":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=320","url_meta":{"origin":552,"position":1},"title":"The stock market is a meaningless ponzi scheme.","author":"kellio","date":"June 16, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"There.\u00a0 I said it. And I mean it.\u00a0 Not that certain stocks are a ponzi scheme....the entire concept of the stock market is a ponzi scheme. Think of all the people that work in industries related to the stock market......are you thinking?\u00a0 There are newspapers, magazines, and entire TV channels\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Favorite Entries"","block_context":{"text":"Favorite Entries","link":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?cat=10"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313,"url":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=313","url_meta":{"origin":552,"position":2},"title":"Is Racism Ok? The issue with Libertarianism.","author":"kellio","date":"May 24, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Rand Paul has come under serious fire lately for his staunch libertarian stance on the Civil Rights Act.\u00a0 The basic gist is:\u00a0 Government doesn't need to interfere in a business's right to be racist if it wants.\u00a0 The market can decide; if people don't like racism, they won't shop at\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=313#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":769,"url":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=769","url_meta":{"origin":552,"position":3},"title":"Income Inequality: Labor is losing and we should care (since we are Labor)","author":"kellio","date":"January 13, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Many believe some version of the following regarding income inequality: The current income distribution is the free market outcome; we can't regulate ourselves out of income inequality...it is a natural outcome of our global economy. The statement is untrue.\u00a0 It is better worded as follows, \"The current income distribution is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Inside My Head"","block_context":{"text":"Inside My Head","link":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?cat=9"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":340,"url":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=340","url_meta":{"origin":552,"position":4},"title":"Fiat Currency and Taxes","author":"kellio","date":"July 8, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is a question: If the government can simply print money.......why do they need to tax us? They don't need our money at all.\u00a0 They have the blank check of the printing press at all times.\u00a0 They could simply spend new money into existence, and leave it at that. As\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Favorite Entries"","block_context":{"text":"Favorite Entries","link":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?cat=10"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":31,"url":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?p=31","url_meta":{"origin":552,"position":5},"title":"Home ownership: Does it make sense?","author":"kellio","date":"November 27, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Or more to the point: does it make sense for me? In a word, No. I'll explain why: A 150 to 200k dollar mortgage ends up between $1000 and $1200 bucks a month. Then you add on internet, gas, power, maintenance, cable, insurance, etc, etc, etc. The price is getting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Inside My Head"","block_context":{"text":"Inside My Head","link":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/?cat=9"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=552"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":554,"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552\/revisions\/554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chasingeden.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}